TAPAS.network | 16 May 2022 | Editorial Opinion | Peter Stonham

Not quite what we planned for - but still an asset

Peter Stonham

IF THE PAST is not always a good guide to what will be happening in the future, the present is not an awful lot better.

We live in unstable times, and the current state of the world is not one of comfortable equilibrium, or certainty on which to build our plans.

Not that it ever really was so in modern times, apart from a few relatively brief and tranquil epochs. One thing that looking backwards can reveal, of course, is how we were once anticipating things might pan out – and the closeness of that to actuality.

From such a ‘forecast future’, frozen in time, we can make a reality check to learn how right – and how wrong – we can be. And what we missed. And maybe why.

quotations 5

Those responsible for transport investment are burdened with particularly critical and sticky decision-making about the future.

In the event, the pattern of demand has much changed since the plan was agreed by all concerned – including, critically, the funders – nearly two decades ago. And even since the construction work began in earnest 12 years ago, when the effective point was passed of not going back, or even much modifying what was to be provided.

The substantial sunk costs – and years of disruption too – mean cancellation is hardly an option, financially or politically, for schemes of this kind.

Now we are at the sharp end of the project, and about to see what the user reaction will be. It is pretty certain the nature of travel behaviour, and the economic and social impacts, will be significantly different to those that were set out in the plan.

It was not that the forecasts were wrong – they might well have been right at the time – but that the world, inevitably, moves on in ways that arguably no-one could truly foresee.

So, as well as back-calibrating what it was that we all missed, and how a more ‘agile’ approach might have made it easier to adjust on the way, the challenge now is to make the most of the asset that now exists rather than still striving to achieve the original outcome.

Here again, transport is not very flexible in that regard. Neither the tunnels, track nor trains can be practically re-deployed.

Planning and building them is challenging and rewarding for thousands of people. But now things move to making the most of them, and to come up with innovative ways of presenting new options to potential users and leveraging the opportunity that the asset presents in the current environment.

Perhaps surprisingly, then, there is not much of a tradition in transport of pulling together talented teams to squeeze the best performance from what now exists when such major public projects go live.

For an analogy, we might take the mobile phone; designed to enable us to make phone calls on the move, the use of the devices is now not primarily for people talking to one another at all. But no one bemoans the awful mistake of the original inventors – they opened the door to undreamt of innovation in communications!

The Writer and Philosopher George Santayana, popularly known for his aphorism “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”, also usefully suggested “We must respect the past, remembering that it was once all that was humanly possible.” Wise words indeed. 

Peter Stonham is the Editorial Director of TAPAS Network

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT845, 16 May 2022.

Read more articles by Peter Stonham
What’s it for? Is it worth it? Did it work?
SEVERAL ITEMS in this issue of LTT explore the justification, implications and outcomes - both forecast and measured - of transport ideas, policies and projects. And that is not unusual at all at this time, as such awkward questions are being raised more and more frequently in the context of scarce financial and other resources to deploy, and the changing social, economic and environmental objectives and priorities that must be the fundamental reason for transport interventions.
A case for better decision-making
BUILDING NEW TRANSPORT FACILITIES has become completely different in concept and rationale in the 200 years or so since the early rail and road entrepreneurs began to develop the first examples of what we now call infrastructure.
New priorities need new delivery frameworks
IN JUST OVER A WEEK’S TIME, the Chancellor will be delivering his Autumn Statement. In this, he will update MPs on the country’s finances and the Government’s tax and public spending plans, based on the latest forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility, and no doubt include a good dose of pre-election political positioning.
Read more articles on TAPAS
Our rail system can’t have a good future when it offers less than the sum of its parts
The Williams-Shapps plan to provide Britain’s railway with a new future structure that will improve the public offer and make the best of the overall resources deployed seems to be being watered down by the new Transport Secretary Mark Harper, fears Jonathan Tyler. He sees the benefits of an integrated system being lost by a wish to give individual private sector interests freedom to do their own thing – with fragmented timetabling and fares offers under-selling the network as a whole.
Cars, trains, buses and flights: How much do we all spend on transport?
Some fascinating figures are revealed by a look at the transport elements of the ONS weekly Household Spending survey- both the balance of different modal categories, and the change over time. John Siraut here examines the data, and what it tells us about the differences across incomes and age distribution.
Politics in the driving seat
TO SOME PEOPLE, politics should be about expressions of leadership and commitment that construct an appeal amongst the electorate to get behind a vision. For others, it is “the art of the possible”, and to get elected, politicians must first listen closely to the concerns and priorities of the voters, and bring them promises of action that resonate. The next 12-18 months will test the primacy of one or other of these two approaches in the run up to the next General Election.