TAPAS.network | 18 June 2024 | Editorial Opinion | Peter Stonham

Plus ça Change...

Peter Stonham

THE MESSAGE we are all hearing from the General Election campaign - at least from everyone but the current Government- is that it is time for a change. What isn’t clear, however, is how that change will play out in the real world, and especially in the world of transport, and what it will mean for the activity of those involved at the front line in planning and delivering transport systems and services.

Statements of intent regarding transport policy always form part of that agenda, of course — not that there are any very clear, comprehensive and cohesive ones being made available at the moment from any of the parties and their Manifestos. These seem to be mainly made up of specific pledges on matters of relative detail like the bus fare cap and the fate of individual road schemes, and vague assertions of ‘new approaches’ to be taken. The practicalities of agreeing strategies and defining guiding principles in making decisions and choices for local and regional transport authorities, and the other nationally responsible transport bodies, will obviously have to wait.

There has been of late, and looks set to remain in transport, a big void in setting out strategic objectives and priorities to make the best use of resources. Wanting economic growth is just a statement of intent, easily applied as a label to justify all manner of proposals. Setting targets to achieve Net Zero to address Climate Change is another good intention too- if not one that figures very strongly in any of the manifestos, bar, not surprisingly, the Greens.

If this General Election is to genuinely to be a point of inflection in the nation’s economic and social development, the trajectory ahead remains highly unclear. We can thus only speculate how things will play out on the ground. The models we have from the past after major changes of government — those led by Attlee, Thatcher and Blair, for example — reflect major ideological shifts and clear new national priorities that provided a reference point for the work of professionals across all the major sectors like education, health, housing, welfare and public services, including transport.

green quotations

There has been, and looks set to remain, in transport, a big void in setting out strategic objectives and priorities to make the best use of resources. Wanting economic growth is just a statement of intent, easily applied as a label to justify all manner of proposals. Setting targets to achieve Net Zero is in itself just another good intention too.

The position today looks very different, with only a couple of clear individual signals relating to transport available from the prospective -very likely- new Labour Government: the effective return of rail and bus transport to public ownership, and a commitment to changing the planning system to boost housing supply. This of course, will surely have implications for transport, but these might be very different depending on which framework for driving the delivery of housing provision is followed, and what compromises are to be made in getting homes built quickly by the private sector through much vaunted moves to ‘speed up’ the planning process.

Much less is being said about other broader issues like promoting sustainable mobility, the achievement of Net Zero, and ensuring equitable access to transport services. Clear indications are needed if these are to be priorities, and if so, some guiding principles sent from national to local politicians and practitioners tackling the subject on the ground. Much is still to be defined. How long it might take a new government to at last issue new Local Transport Plan guidance can only be a matter of conjecture. In contrast to the last newly-arriving Labour administration in 1997, there is a big void. This is the position held at that time by Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, who was the big hitting presence in environment, transport and regional development policy, ready to get going with the benefit of considerable preparatory work done in Opposition to that end.

With the much more cloudy picture this time, and no obvious policy agenda, there is much to speculate upon. In this issue three expert contributors look at the tough realities and hard choices that will shape the work of those in local transport over the next few years, following the election.

Two thoughtful contributions, from David Leeder and Jonathan Bray, reflect on what might, or might not, be really different with a new Government in place, and in particular upon the national financial context that will constrain the flow of available resources, and on the extent of new thinking we might expect on policy about both mobility provision and the wider planning and local government agenda. We also have a detailed examination from Mark Frost on how a realistic pathway to decarbonisation can be put in place in London. He considers what options the newly re-elected Mayor has available to deliver the ambitious target of achieving Net Zero by 2030, given the policy parameters he has set for his administration locally, and the national framework he must work within.

The verdict of all three of our contributors is that freedom of action on transport is going to be much limited by external matters, both political and economic. Progress is thus likely to depend on creative thinking about which transport projects at the local level can unlock the restricted resources available, to apply them in the most cost-effective and beneficial ways, and with the greatest impact on desirable travel outcomes and supporting sustainable economic growth.

Tensions between what is desirable in transport planning terms, and what is politically acceptable do not seem set to become any easier to resolve, whoever is in the national hot seat on transport

Let’s therefore hope that when the nation has spoken on July 4th some productive discussion can take place- so politicians and practitioners, national and local, can identify common horizons against which to draw up achievable plans. After all, outcome- driven analysis and intervention justification is the key to good decisions, and for that a broad consensus on desired outcomes is rather essential.

What seems a strong bet is that squaring the troublesome trio of economic growth, sustainable development and social equity will still set a problematic context for transport.

Despite all the talk of political change brought by the General Election, thoughts amongst those responsible for the provision of transport systems and their planning will soon need to turn again to the practicalities of that challenge - and in what ways, if any, it will be different.

Peter Stonham is the Editorial Director of TAPAS Network

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT894, 18 June 2024.

d2-20220516-1
taster
Read more articles by Peter Stonham
Asking the experts
In what could be seen as a positive step for enriching the breadth and depth of the specialist knowledge available to government, the Department for Transport has identified 45 experts to join a new advisory panel. But perhaps more interesting is how it will use them.
Uber thinking goes beyond taxis
FROM ITS BEGINNINGS in the early days of the last decade, Uber was clear about its plans for long-term disruption to the transport system - and of a willingness for self-disruption too. Keen observers recognised the company’s long-term goal was more than simply helping users ride in other people’s cars. It sought the eventual ability and role of letting those looking for travel facilities book any option within its app. It was not the only startup with a vision of a fully tech-enabled transportation future of this kind, of course.
Most decisions have climate consequences. But can we really seek to embrace them all?
THE LAST FEW YEARS have seen much debate and legal challenge on how the impacts of transport projects, particularly highway schemes, should be properly assessed and appraised for their wider environmental consequences. A significant number of major road schemes have been delayed whilst the various stages of challenges have been pursued by environmental activists going to court.
Read more articles on TAPAS
ITF report spells out Global shortfall on meeting transport decarbonisation targets
This year’s major ITF Transport Outlook Report focusses on the global pathway to net zero transport and finds that the current trajectory is well short of meeting intended commitments
Cycling fatalities are rising in the Netherlands – so, why are we still trying to emulate their approach?
The Netherlands has long been lauded as a safe cycling nation. But new data suggests that cycling fatalities there are on the rise, with the increased use of e-bikes, especially by older people, seen as a possible reason. In Britain, meanwhile, cycling fatalities and rates per billion kms are going down. Should we still be trying to emulate the Dutch approach to road safety, asks Vincent Stops, in the first of a three part series looking at current cycle policy issues.
Making the right case, Using the right tools?
THERE’S QUITE A HEAD of steam building up for a long hard look at how transport investment fits into the UK’s wider economic, social and sustainability strategy. Plenty of examples are cropping up that illustrate the issues - and they are complex and cross cutting. In the present landscape there is, moreover, a big danger of different agencies and authorities ‘doing their own thing’ and claiming they are ‘meeting important objectives’ that might well be true - but could equally well be inhibiting or making impossible the delivery of others.