TAPAS.network | 8 April 2022 | Editorial Opinion | Peter Stonham

A Climate for Change?

Peter Stonham

ANOTHER REPORT from the experts, another apparent shrug of the shoulders from most of those who might usefully really take its worrying message on board. The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has now published its latest guidance on what the world must do to avoid an extremely dangerous future. 

So, what’s the problem in not acknowledging the import of the massive 3675 page piece of work entitled Sixth Assessment report, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation & Vulnerability. Too long to read? Well at least there also is a 37-page summary for policymakers, with information on the impacts of climate change on nature and human activity.

Perhaps a simple three-word message, like “we’re all doomed’ as Dad’s Army’s Private Frazer might have put it, would have better got the message across? Or the four words “ It’s now or never” as used by Imperial College London’s Professor Jim Skea, co-chair of IPCC Working Group III, the group of 278 authors responsible for the report.

At least the head of the UN, ultimate stewards of the report, didn’t mince his words either.

“Some government and business leaders are saying one thing - but doing another. Simply put, they are lying. And the results will be catastrophic,” said UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres.

Even if all the policies to cut carbon that governments had put in place by the end of 2020 were fully implemented, the world will still warm by 3.2˚C this century says the report.

That sort of temperature rise would see our planet hit by “unprecedented heatwaves, terrifying storms, and widespread water shortages”.

To avoid that fate, the world must keep the rise in temperatures at or under 1.5˚C this century.

The scientists have at least unveiled a plan that they believe can limit the root causes of dangerous climate change. 

quotations 5

Even if all the policies to cut carbon that governments had put in place by the end of 2020 were fully implemented, the world will still warm by 3.2˚C this century says the report.

They say that there must be “rapid, deep and immediate” cuts in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Currently rising Global emissions of CO2 would need to peak within three years to stave off the worst impacts.

But that means massive changes to energy production, industry, our consumption patterns and the way we treat nature. And our transport activity is in the front line to have to change. Its carbon emissions must peak by 2025, and fall rapidly after that, reaching net-zero by the middle of this century.

“I think the report tells us that we’ve reached the now-or-never point of limiting warming to 1.5C,” said IPCC lead author Heleen De Coninck, Professor of Socio-Technical Innovation and Climate Change at Eindhoven University of Technology.

The next few years are critical, say the researchers, because if emissions aren’t significantly curbed by 2030, it will make it nigh on impossible to limit warming later this century.

For transport, in practice, this means governments doing more to encourage walking and cycling instead of car travel, getting people to fly less, and putting in place the infrastructure for far more electric vehicles. For individuals, it means accepting the implications of all this.

The report suggests that increasing urbanisation could help drive adoption of mitigation strategies such as reduced car use, and renewable energy.

Keeping temperatures down will still require new technology to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, though some participants in the IPCC process are highly sceptical that such approaches will work.

“The idea of quick emissions reductions and large negative emissions technologies are a concern,” said Prof Arthur Petersen, from UCL, who was an observer in the approval session.

“There are a lot of pipe dreams in this report.”

It’s not that there hasn’t been plenty of brainpower and evidence brought together in its preparation, and of the others in the series of six IPCC reports which assess scientific, technical, and socio- economic information concerning climate change.

A total of 234 scientists from 66 countries have contributed to the three working group reports built on more than 14,000 scientific papers to produce the massive tomes of data and analysis. The final synthesis report is due to be finished by late 2022.

So, what’s missing from the discussion that could mean a clearer, faster practical response from both governments and citizens?

As our regular contributor John Dales explains in this issue of LTT it seems to be a fundamental feature of the human brain that it puts the immediate ahead of the future and looks for the distraction of the simplistic over the complex. We also know, to our cost, that only manifest crisis brings real change. Ask Ukraine.

Put brutally, it seems to most people and their leaders, the Climate Crisis hasn’t quite arrived yet. 

Peter Stonham is the Editorial Director of TAPAS Network

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT843, 8 April 2022.

d2-20220516-1
taster
Read more articles by Peter Stonham
Putting Local decision-making in its proper Place
WITH LOCAL ELECTIONS about to take place, it would be nice to think that relevant transport issues affecting particular places and council areas would be suitably under the spotlight; and forming at least a part of citizens’ considerations for whom they should cast their vote. But, sadly, such local polls are invariably seen as an opportunity to pass judgement on the performance of the political parties at a national level, on issues that particular authorities are actually in no real position to do much about.
Time for Total Transport to come out of the DfT’s ‘too difficult’ tray
NEW APPROACHES to how transport is most effectively planned and delivered tend to be more usually developed in modal, technological, operational or geographical silos, rather than all-embracing new paradigms. Changes generally emerge from disruptive new players, particular entrepreneurs breaking new ground and taking risks, technological revolutions, or challenging local political leaders prepared to stick their necks out. These are rarely characteristics to be found in centralised bodies or public authorities — least of all government departments.
Worth some thought before councils sent charging ahead?
THE FEATURE in the issue of LTT 848 looks at the way in which UK government policy and ambitions about Electric Vehicle (EV) roll-out have been involving transport authorities at the local level. And some of the challenges that are emerging in achieving the right balance and level of provision of charging facilities involving a whole host of prospective players. It’s definitely a fact that without suitable such facilities neither the required consumer confidence or practical electricity energy supply will be possible to underpin this important element of transport’s contribution to meeting the net zero target.
Read more articles on TAPAS
England’s Integrated National Transport Strategy: responding to the call for ideas
The Government has asked for input in its planned creation of a new Integrated National Transport Strategy for England. Professor Glenn Lyons looks with some disappointment at the way the consultation has been structured, and issues for consideration specified. He fears some important areas for attention have been surprisingly overlooked. He offers his own ten 'Big Ideas' he hopes the strategy will nonetheless address.
A Transport Convergence: The right policies will favour all of safety, environment, and economy
We may have reached a point where the different key criteria that have driven transport scheme justification are becoming mutually reinforcing feels Phil Goodwin. He suggests that policy should recognise that the three greatest priorities require overlapping , and in some cases identical, policy measures – which together imply a shift of resource allocation away from roads.
Lifestyle choice, not modal choice, needed to really tackle transport’s climate problem
ADDRESSING TRANSPORT'S climate change implications and very substantial carbon deficit is generally acknowledged to be something that must involve more than changing the fuels in the vehicles we use, as the Committee on Climate Change again emphasises in its critical new report to Government. It is the latest entity to be alarmed at the rate of progress towards Net Zero, and the apparent lack of urgency on that mission within Government, and recognition of its full required extent.