TAPAS.network | 14 January 2022 | Editorial Opinion | Peter Stonham

Technology brings challenges as well as benefits

Peter Stonham

IT’S AN OBVIOUS TRUTH that we live in a world being constantly reshaped by technology. And no more so than in transport.

In preparing just this edition of LTT we have addressed the issues of autonomous and remotely driven vehicles, aerial drone deliveries, smart cross-modal digital payment systems, harnessing data about the stops, stations and nodes in the public transport system, and introducing hydrogen powered buses.

It all adds up to a continuing revolution in how transport is both supplied and used. And that's without specifically considering the wider issue of the accelerating arrival of Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications to replace the human elements of transport provision that were once a massive creator of jobs – and costs – that both the commercial operators and public sector now target for 'efficiency savings'.

We've come a long way down that path already. Starting with the mechanisation of vehicles, when an engine replaced the horses and their grooms, and then when conductors and guards were dispensed with on buses and trains and the docks were stripped of myriads of manual labourers with the advent of containers. And when transport operators started using computers to schedule, then track and control the movements of their rolling stock.

Listening to the recently completed 2021 BBC Reith Lectures by Professor Stuart Russell, he drove home both the significance of the Artificial Intelligence explosion now taking place, and how many implications and consequences have been far from yet fully considered or grasped.

quotations 5

How will the economy adapt as work is increasingly done by machines?

Russell, Professor of Computer Science and founder of the Center for Human-Compatible Artificial Intelligence at the University of California, Berkeley, explored how we can retain power over machines more powerful than ourselves, and even the risk of an apocalyptic future.

He quoted the words of former Reith lecturer Professor Stephen Hawking in 2014, “Success in creating AI would be the biggest event in human history. Unfortunately, it might also be the last, unless we learn how to avoid the risks.”

In one of his lectures Russell explored one of the most sharply focussed issues of AI – the threat to jobs, and the role of work in human life. How will the economy adapt as work is increasingly done by machines? Economists’ forecasts range from rosy scenarios of human-AI teamwork, to dystopic visions in which most people are excluded from the economy altogether.

There doesn't yet seem to be much discussion in the transport community of how these kinds of issues will affect both the operation of the sector, and its role in the bigger scheme of things. And yet massive changes could be only a few years away.

It often feels like the role of technology is regarded as simply to help us do the same as now, only better. It could surely mean a great deal more than that – both for good, and ill.

Russell concluded his lectures with the call for a new way to think about AI systems and human-AI coexistence based on three principles – chief among them the idea that machines should know that they don’t know what humans’ true objectives are. Machines designed according to the new model should be, Russell suggests, deferential to humans, cautious and minimally invasive in their behaviour. And, crucially, willing to be switched off. Even back in 2001 HAL wasn't so keen on that.

Peter Stonham is the Editorial Director of TAPAS Network

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT837, 14 January 2022.

d1-20220114
taster
Read more articles by Peter Stonham
Time for Total Transport to come out of the DfT’s ‘too difficult’ tray
NEW APPROACHES to how transport is most effectively planned and delivered tend to be more usually developed in modal, technological, operational or geographical silos, rather than all-embracing new paradigms. Changes generally emerge from disruptive new players, particular entrepreneurs breaking new ground and taking risks, technological revolutions, or challenging local political leaders prepared to stick their necks out. These are rarely characteristics to be found in centralised bodies or public authorities — least of all government departments.
Time for a wider look at transport’s trickiest challenges
THERE’S NO SHORTAGE of opinion and ideas about the best way forward for transport. The problem is that they can’t all be pursued, and not all of the ideas and policies being proposed are rooted in either science or evidence. They represent a lot of ‘conventional wisdom’, and some ‘unconventional wisdom’ both of which have not always been subject to either practical or even laboratory testing for their efficacy and current and future circumstances.
Putting Local decision-making in its proper Place
THERE’S NO SHORTAGE of opinion and ideas about the best way forward for transport. The problem is that they can’t all be pursued, and not all of the ideas and policies being proposed are rooted in either science or evidence. They represent a lot of ‘conventional wisdom’, and some ‘unconventional wisdom’ both of which have not always been subject to either practical or even laboratory testing for their efficacy and current and future circumstances.
Read more articles on TAPAS
‘Cycling First’ policy for London has badly damaged buses
In the second in his series looking at cycling policy issues, Vincent Stops reflects on the damaging consequences of Boris Johnson’s London Mayoralty when he let his pro- cycling policy do significant damage to the Capital’s bus services. A more balanced approach is essential, he argues
Who is driving transport’s future now?
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS in the arena of British transport policy could well be responsible for a few heart attacks and nervous breakdowns. For many in the transport planning world, long cherished notions of what constitute obvious steps towards a better more sustainable transport system appear to be under serious attack.
Triple Access Planning is a useful concept – but have the practicalities been fully thought through?
Recognition that transport provision is just one part of achieving spatial connectivity and user accessibility is a welcome step says David Metz. But he feels that the formalised concept of Triple Access Planning is an idealised approach to embracing this truism, and the realities of specific geographic transport challenges, available practical options, and public and political behavioural expectations mean the theory will be hard to deploy successfully.