TAPAS.network | 14 January 2022 | Editorial Opinion | Peter Stonham

Technology brings challenges as well as benefits

Peter Stonham

IT’S AN OBVIOUS TRUTH that we live in a world being constantly reshaped by technology. And no more so than in transport.

In preparing just this edition of LTT we have addressed the issues of autonomous and remotely driven vehicles, aerial drone deliveries, smart cross-modal digital payment systems, harnessing data about the stops, stations and nodes in the public transport system, and introducing hydrogen powered buses.

It all adds up to a continuing revolution in how transport is both supplied and used. And that's without specifically considering the wider issue of the accelerating arrival of Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications to replace the human elements of transport provision that were once a massive creator of jobs – and costs – that both the commercial operators and public sector now target for 'efficiency savings'.

We've come a long way down that path already. Starting with the mechanisation of vehicles, when an engine replaced the horses and their grooms, and then when conductors and guards were dispensed with on buses and trains and the docks were stripped of myriads of manual labourers with the advent of containers. And when transport operators started using computers to schedule, then track and control the movements of their rolling stock.

Listening to the recently completed 2021 BBC Reith Lectures by Professor Stuart Russell, he drove home both the significance of the Artificial Intelligence explosion now taking place, and how many implications and consequences have been far from yet fully considered or grasped.

quotations 5

How will the economy adapt as work is increasingly done by machines?

Russell, Professor of Computer Science and founder of the Center for Human-Compatible Artificial Intelligence at the University of California, Berkeley, explored how we can retain power over machines more powerful than ourselves, and even the risk of an apocalyptic future.

He quoted the words of former Reith lecturer Professor Stephen Hawking in 2014, “Success in creating AI would be the biggest event in human history. Unfortunately, it might also be the last, unless we learn how to avoid the risks.”

In one of his lectures Russell explored one of the most sharply focussed issues of AI – the threat to jobs, and the role of work in human life. How will the economy adapt as work is increasingly done by machines? Economists’ forecasts range from rosy scenarios of human-AI teamwork, to dystopic visions in which most people are excluded from the economy altogether.

There doesn't yet seem to be much discussion in the transport community of how these kinds of issues will affect both the operation of the sector, and its role in the bigger scheme of things. And yet massive changes could be only a few years away.

It often feels like the role of technology is regarded as simply to help us do the same as now, only better. It could surely mean a great deal more than that – both for good, and ill.

Russell concluded his lectures with the call for a new way to think about AI systems and human-AI coexistence based on three principles – chief among them the idea that machines should know that they don’t know what humans’ true objectives are. Machines designed according to the new model should be, Russell suggests, deferential to humans, cautious and minimally invasive in their behaviour. And, crucially, willing to be switched off. Even back in 2001 HAL wasn't so keen on that.

Peter Stonham is the Editorial Director of TAPAS Network

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT837, 14 January 2022.

d1-20220114
taster
Read more articles by Peter Stonham
A world away from what’s needed
ANYONE LOOKING at the graph from the new report by the International Transport Forum, ITF, that looks at the pathway to decarbonisation in transpoort across the world will probably find it rather familiar. The UK equivalent of that yawning gap between aspiration, necessity and reality is something we have covered in TAPAS extensively in recent months, particularly the work of Professor Greg Marsden, who has closely studied the UK’s trajectory towards achieving net zero in transport.
Planning homes and transport together - an incomplete connection
THERE IS a big difference between building an individual home, or even a group of new houses, and designing for the needs of a community of people who live in the same place. That’s why the word neighbourhood exists. It’s also why planning exists.
Budget thinking could define this Government’s term for transport
THERE IS a big difference between building an individual home, or even a group of new houses, and designing for the needs of a community of people who live in the same place. That’s why the word neighbourhood exists. It’s also why planning exists.
Read more articles on TAPAS
Exceptional transport changemakers are rare - but we need them badly now
LEE WATERS is stepping down as Welsh Transport minister after five years, and will be much missed. He has been arguably the most important political transport post holder in the UK since Ken Livingstone was the London Mayor – at least in the eyes of those looking at things from a professional perspective.
We are now facing two alternative futures (plus an untenable one)
MY COLUMN THIS WEEK, written with Professor Jillian Anable, is a summary of our forthcoming paper[1] on ‘Two Futures’. It has required rethinking some of our previous work, including our two unsuccessful witness statements in Court. It affects assessment of the DfT’s Decarbonising Transport[2] report, and CCC’s work on ‘adaptation’ to climate change. The speed of climate change is now faster than the implementation of measures to limit it. It follows that we are now faced with two real alternative futures.
Transport matters a lot - but not in elections. And that, on the whole, is a good thing
This publication, and its readers, are both really concerned about transports matters. But, as John Dales argues here, that’s not generally the position of most ordinary citizens, with transport not at all a defining issue when it comes to national elections. So why, he wonders, did the Conservatives go overboard in trying to make the needs of drivers a key plank of their pitch? He’s pretty confident it was a pointless exercise, and is quite pleased about that too.