TAPAS.network | 11 March 2022 | Editorial Opinion | Peter Stonham

Consequences of the war could further hasten transport change

Peter Stonham

THE WAR IN UKRAINE has already shaken the world order to its foundations, and we still don’t know just how far further the consequences may go.

But all the signs are that beyond the human catastrophe, the economic and social implications are likely to be profound and enduring.

Higher domestic and industrial energy prices were already a fact of life and transforming home heating costs. Now they are set to re-model the transport equation too.

Put most simply, the price of a tank of fossil fuel has been rocketing and looks set to continue to do so as Russian oil is shunned by the West.

Will that put the brakes on the surge in private motoring brought by the experience of Covid-19 at the expense of bus and rail? Will it hasten the switch to electric mobility – by cars, and other micro modes – or will higher electric vehicle purchase and power costs be a brake on that? And will it reduce the attractiveness of leisure travel – both domestically by car and internationally by air? Household budgets must be re-configured if the large new energy costs are not met by higher wages – and where will the costs of running and using a car sit in that equation? Essential, or dispensable? In the particular context of transport and travel in rural areas, higher energy costs will have an even more significant impact, because distances are longer and mode choices limited. Might this hasten innovation from the supply side, with a new business case emerging for shared mobility or demand responsive transport in rural areas, and less profligate freight and delivery vehicle patterns? 

quotations 5

A wartime message from the past was, “Is your journey really necessary”. To which might now be added, “And is it affordable either?”. Or sustainable.

Meanwhile Working From Home seems set to become both a convenience and a cost-saving act - so will many commuting journeys ever return? New behavioural paradigms will take a while to emerge, but modal switches could strengthen the sustainability and de-carbonising agendas – and whilst cutting the Chancellor’s tax take from fuel duty even more, maybe push more fares revenue towards the struggling rail and bus networks.

The war effects just join the post-Pandemic, post-Brexit and Climate Change influences on the way we choose to travel personally, for work purposes and to move goods around too.

Whilst much of the driving forces are outside any government control, something positive which governments could do right now is a prominent marketing campaign to publicise public transport as safe to use again (after Covid), low carbon, and a way to beat the rising petrol prices. There would be a direct financial return on the campaign because trains and buses are still dependent on recovery funding – the quicker revenue comes back, the shorter the recovery funding period will last.

There may be other initiatives that the Government could take too – both to reflect better solutions for individual travel needs, and to steer and support the freight and logistics sector in becoming more fuel efficient and to reduce the number and length of overall vehicle movements that has come with the expansion of home shopping and the growing expectation of next day deliveries.

A wartime message from the past was, “Is your journey really necessary”. To which might now be added, “And is it affordable either?”. Or sustainable.

The ‘back to normal’ aspiration for our lifestyles looks more and more like an impossible dream. But the patterns of travel to plan for in five, ten and even thirty years seem ever more difficult to nail down.

And that’s without any further traumatic interruptions to the way of life we had become used to.

And who would rule that out?

Peter Stonham is the Editorial Director of TAPAS Network

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT841, 11 March 2022.

d2-20220516-1
taster
Read more articles by Peter Stonham
Time to redefine ‘road safety’?
THE ANIVERSARY of the introduction of compulsory seatbelt wearing 40 years ago usefully prompts some reflections on the changing perceptions and priorities relating to what has traditionally been known as ‘road safety’. As does the fact that a significantly amended version of the Highway Code, introducing the concept of a road user hierarchy of responsibility for the first time, was issued a year ago, as explored in a contribution to this issue from Tom Cohen.
What’s it for? Is it worth it? Did it work?
SEVERAL ITEMS in this issue of LTT explore the justification, implications and outcomes - both forecast and measured - of transport ideas, policies and projects. And that is not unusual at all at this time, as such awkward questions are being raised more and more frequently in the context of scarce financial and other resources to deploy, and the changing social, economic and environmental objectives and priorities that must be the fundamental reason for transport interventions.
Missions and visions all the talk - but whose views count most?
THE PRIME MINISTER relentlessly talks of missions, the transport planning profession increasingly of visions. It’s easy language- but what does it really mean? Are they the same thing, or if not, are they compatible? Might there be a better way than either of these two concepts to properly think about where we are hoping to get to with policies and the deployment of resources - and what is visible, trackable and measurable to chart the progress of that?
Read more articles on TAPAS
Technology brings challenges as well as benefits
IT’S AN OBVIOUS TRUTH that we live in a world being constantly reshaped by technology. And no more so than in transport. In preparing just this edition of LTT we have addressed the issues of autonomous and remotely driven vehicles, aerial drone deliveries, smart cross-modal digital payment systems, harnessing data about the stops, stations and nodes in the public transport system, and introducing hydrogen powered buses.
Plenty of judgement, but not enough evidence
THE PAST FEW WEEKS have seen a high-profile debate about the effectiveness and benefits of a number of important transport policy measures, most specifically the London Ultra Low Emission Zone, and other Clean Air Zones; 20mph urban speed limits; and Low Traffic Neighbourhoods. Alongside this we have had the benefit of detaled analysis of the the Elizabeth Line which provides a best practice case study of monitoring and evaluation with important potential consequences for forecasting the responses to future schemes. 
Not quite what we planned for - but still an asset
IF THE PAST is not always a good guide to what will be happening in the future, the present is not an awful lot better. We live in unstable times, and the current state of the world is not one of comfortable equilibrium, or certainty on which to build our plans. Not that it ever really was so in modern times, apart from a few relatively brief and tranquil epochs. One thing that looking backwards can reveal, of course, is how we were once anticipating things might pan out – and the closeness of that to actuality.