TAPAS.network | 11 March 2022 | Editorial Opinion | Peter Stonham

Consequences of the war could further hasten transport change

Peter Stonham

THE WAR IN UKRAINE has already shaken the world order to its foundations, and we still don’t know just how far further the consequences may go.

But all the signs are that beyond the human catastrophe, the economic and social implications are likely to be profound and enduring.

Higher domestic and industrial energy prices were already a fact of life and transforming home heating costs. Now they are set to re-model the transport equation too.

Put most simply, the price of a tank of fossil fuel has been rocketing and looks set to continue to do so as Russian oil is shunned by the West.

Will that put the brakes on the surge in private motoring brought by the experience of Covid-19 at the expense of bus and rail? Will it hasten the switch to electric mobility – by cars, and other micro modes – or will higher electric vehicle purchase and power costs be a brake on that? And will it reduce the attractiveness of leisure travel – both domestically by car and internationally by air? Household budgets must be re-configured if the large new energy costs are not met by higher wages – and where will the costs of running and using a car sit in that equation? Essential, or dispensable? In the particular context of transport and travel in rural areas, higher energy costs will have an even more significant impact, because distances are longer and mode choices limited. Might this hasten innovation from the supply side, with a new business case emerging for shared mobility or demand responsive transport in rural areas, and less profligate freight and delivery vehicle patterns? 

quotations 5

A wartime message from the past was, “Is your journey really necessary”. To which might now be added, “And is it affordable either?”. Or sustainable.

Meanwhile Working From Home seems set to become both a convenience and a cost-saving act - so will many commuting journeys ever return? New behavioural paradigms will take a while to emerge, but modal switches could strengthen the sustainability and de-carbonising agendas – and whilst cutting the Chancellor’s tax take from fuel duty even more, maybe push more fares revenue towards the struggling rail and bus networks.

The war effects just join the post-Pandemic, post-Brexit and Climate Change influences on the way we choose to travel personally, for work purposes and to move goods around too.

Whilst much of the driving forces are outside any government control, something positive which governments could do right now is a prominent marketing campaign to publicise public transport as safe to use again (after Covid), low carbon, and a way to beat the rising petrol prices. There would be a direct financial return on the campaign because trains and buses are still dependent on recovery funding – the quicker revenue comes back, the shorter the recovery funding period will last.

There may be other initiatives that the Government could take too – both to reflect better solutions for individual travel needs, and to steer and support the freight and logistics sector in becoming more fuel efficient and to reduce the number and length of overall vehicle movements that has come with the expansion of home shopping and the growing expectation of next day deliveries.

A wartime message from the past was, “Is your journey really necessary”. To which might now be added, “And is it affordable either?”. Or sustainable.

The ‘back to normal’ aspiration for our lifestyles looks more and more like an impossible dream. But the patterns of travel to plan for in five, ten and even thirty years seem ever more difficult to nail down.

And that’s without any further traumatic interruptions to the way of life we had become used to.

And who would rule that out?

Peter Stonham is the Editorial Director of TAPAS Network

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT841, 11 March 2022.

d2-20220516-1
taster
Read more articles by Peter Stonham
Long-term thinking on local public transport finances needed now
THE LATEST post-pandemic support that the Government agreed to provide to local public transport two weeks ago amounts to a further holding operation to the sector’s fragile finances. Without the continuing tranches of such public funding over the past almost three years, it should be acknowledged that things would be in a much worse place than they would have been otherwise. That said, it was already the Government’s agenda to halt continuing declines in levels of bus service and patronage, and instead create a positive climate of the kind set out in the Bus Back Better ambitions document during the Covid-19 pandemic itself.
Un-required reading?
LAST WEEK, the Department for Transport released a batch of thirty research reports in a single day. They cover a range of elements, a significant number addressing inputs and processes used in Modelling and Appraisal, plus some modal-specific topics and scheme trial evaluations. Some are recently dated, but others were obviously delivered to the DfT over a period going back well over a year.
Levelling up is a challenge for transport too
IT IS EASY to look at the idea of ‘Levelling Up’ through either cynical or simplistic eyes. ‘It’s just a slogan’ or ‘Not enough money’ are familiar comments. For transport people, it would similarly be a mistake to just look for the bit in the policy about transport, and what the objectives or possible funding are for local schemes or service provision, and to say ‘so that’s where we fit in’. But the subject is surely rather more of a challenge than that – for transport, just as it is for everyone concerned.
Read more articles on TAPAS
Free Tickets – from a directors’ perk to a tool of climate change policy
IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS on 1 March, 1966 (para 577), the Earl of Dundonald suggested that it was time for the free holiday travel facilities available to railway employees, their wives and families to be reviewed. Lord Lindgren, for the Government, pointed out that this was not, in fact, costing anything and indeed its withdrawal would probably increase the wages bill. On being pressed on it, he answered, rather waspishly, that “as an old railwayman, I know that some of the directors of the old railway companies, some of whom are in this House, still have their gold passes to take them anywhere they like”.
We have knowledge but not power. We need a toolkit for our times to help translate our insight into useful practice
In his 200th Street Talk column for LTT magazine John Dales reflects on some of the recurring issues he has covered over the past 18 years, and the diagnoses he has refined to enduring problems and challenges. He argues that transport planners, having knowledge but not power, need urgently to work differently if we’re to translate our insight into better outcomes, and he provides an 8-point ‘manifesto’ for how we might do this.
Exceptional transport changemakers are rare - but we need them badly now
LEE WATERS is stepping down as Welsh Transport minister after five years, and will be much missed. He has been arguably the most important political transport post holder in the UK since Ken Livingstone was the London Mayor – at least in the eyes of those looking at things from a professional perspective.