TAPAS.network | 16 May 2022 | Examining Evidence  | Elizabeth Line

Elizabeth Line opening will test reality of much changed Crossrail demand patterns

As the long-delayed new East West rail line for London finally opens, it remains to be seen how closely the usage patterns will match the original forecasts, and what the impacts of post Pandemic behavioural change will be. Rhodri Clark and Peter Stonham look at what was expected – and how different the response to the new service might now be

el.1.1


MANY PEOPLE
 in the transport profession will be keeping a keen eye on how the Elizabeth line passenger numbers pan out as the line’s central tunnelled section finally settles into operation.

Predicting usage for the radical new transport option for London was a challenge even in comparatively settled times when the final plans were signed off two decades ago. Nothing on the scale of the Crossrail project had been attempted in the UK previously, and London’s characteristics made it difficult to read across from cross-city rail projects in other countries.

Crossrail’s own website continues to predict: “An estimated 200 million annual passengers will use the Elizabeth line.” The headline figure has not been changed for over a decade, despite the Covid-19 pandemic turning commuting patterns on their head.

The National Audit Office commented last year: “When the Elizabeth line opens, there will be a railway with all the expected stations and interchanges, and train services to support the benefits set out in the business case in terms of improved capacity and connectivity in London and the South East.

“However, these benefits were based on predicted increases in population and travel demand set in 2011 and 2015, which may be less likely to occur, at least in the short term. Increases in passenger demand have slowed since 2015-16, and the Covid-19 pandemic may have more long-reaching impacts on travel.

“Opening the line and getting passengers to use it is critical to TfL’s financial planning. TfL’s January 2021 scenario planning indicated an 18% drop in demand for rail by 2031, with a potential longer-term revenue risk of around £150m a year if demand for the Elizabeth line grows more slowly than expected.”

The long-delayed start of operation of the new cross-London Elizabeth Line will take place on Tuesday 24 May 2022 with services between Paddington and Abbey Wood. TfL Rail services from Reading and Heathrow to Paddington mainline, and Shenfield to Liverpool Street mainline will be rebranded to the Elizabeth line on this day. Bond Street will not open in line with the rest of the central London stations and is expected to do so three months later.

Developed as the CrossRail project, The Elizabeth line is expected to transform travel across London and the South East by dramatically improving connectivity, cutting journey times, providing additional capacity, and transforming accessibility with spacious new stations and walk-through trains.

Opening of the new line is seen as a significant element to London’s recovery from the pandemic, but likely to play a rather different role from the forecasts behind the original CrossRail plan now nearly 20 years old, and even from the originally intended pre-pandemic opening date of December 2018. It was conceived as providing new fast journey options for both commuters and shoppers and leisure travellers into central London, supporting regeneration in newly connected parts of the capital, and adding an estimated £42bn to the UK economy. But both work and shopping behaviour have been much changed by the Pandemic, and there is speculation that travel patterns could now be significantly different from those originally forecast.

Capacity of the peak time service from Paddington to Whitechapel will be 24 trains per hour when the Elizabeth line is fully open. But how will they be used - and will that be justified?

Starting Tuesday 24 May 2022, the Elizabeth line will operate 12 trains per hour between Paddington and Abbey Wood, Monday to Saturday from 06:30 to 23:00.

With earlier post war plans for something similar for London to the RER lines in Paris that first opened in 1977, Crossrail construction finally began in May 2009 after 35 years of planning, development, reviews and postponement.

The official known cost so far has topped £18.6bn., a figure revealed when the 2020 £825m bailout was confirmed to complete the project, though the latest estimate on a further funding shortfall is £174m. Before that it was revealed at the end of 2018 that Crossrail was already set to cost up to an additional £2bn over then then expected figure of £15.4 bn.

el.1.3
el.1.2

Pre-opening operations have been undertaken with volunteers to test systems and emergency procedures

el.1.4

The Elizabeth line is the most significant addition to London’s transport network in a generation. As with the North-South options opened up by Thameslink, and the Jubilee Line’s penetration into Docklands and East London, the new railway is set to transform life and travel in London and the South East.

The Elizabeth line will initially operate as three separate railways, with services from Reading, Heathrow and Shenfield connecting with the central tunnels from autumn this year. All services between Reading and Heathrow to Paddington and Shenfield to Liverpool Street, currently operating as TfL Rail, will be rebranded to the Elizabeth line.

In 2015, Paddington was forecast to have the highest number of passengers entering the Elizabeth line in the morning peak, 07.00 to 10.00, by 2026. The total of 21,850 entries included passengers using the line’s interchange with the Network Rail station. The busiest destinations in the morning peak on the Elizabeth Line were expected to be Tottenham Court Road and Canary Wharf, both with more than 20,000 exits between 07.00 and 10.00.

Paddington was also expected to be a major commuting destination for the new railway, perhaps reflecting the area’s dramatically improved accessibility for residents of East London and beyond. Overall, Paddington was forecast to be the line’s busiest station in the morning peak, with 33,700 entries and exits combined.

It has already been reported that London’s rail commuter market, in particular, has suffered from the change in working routines, with a relatively high proportion of London employment lending itself to working from home. On the other hand, the Elizabeth line’s magnetism is so large that it could stimulate significant new commuting by rail across the region, taking into account its interchanges with rail arteries such as the Great Western and Great Eastern main lines. The Thameslink interchange at Farringdon will connect the new line to many places north and south of the Thames.

The generous sizes of the trains and stations could be another plus for the Elizabeth line - and not just for capacity reasons. People now value personal space more highly than they did before the pandemic, and it could benefit the Elizabeth line if London commuting evolves in a less “peaky” format over the coming years. An even distribution of passengers across the day would be ideal, since it would prevent crowding becoming a deterrent at certain times.

Interestingly, the experience in cities such as Munich that developed a mini-Crossrail – and even with Thameslink – is that the forecasting focus was on trips to the central city area. What was generally underestimated was entirely new cross-city trips that were stimulated by the new line. It was as though many people’s mental maps expanded, opening up entirely new opportunities.

It might, however, take years for ideas of where people can now choose to live and still reach workplaces and colleges, opportunities for new development and repurposing of old buildings, and thoughts about days out for leisure purposes into London’s hinterland fully work their way into fruition.

The Elizabeth line is certainly no one-trick pony. It was always intended to help people go shopping, sightseeing or on nights out, and for a multitude of other journey purposes. Rail has actually been performing strongly in this arena of activity since the harshest Covid-19 restrictions were eased, with leisure demand reported in March to be exceeding pre-pandemic levels - and boosting weekend traffic to above weekday levels.

To what extent could leisure travel, in spite of the growing shortage of disposable income as price increases bite, compensate for lower commuting than expected? A 2014 study by Arup provides food for thought. It explored the impact of Crossrail on Central London visitor numbers, and forecast that the combined demand at Bond Street, Tottenham Court Road and Farringdon stations by 2026 would be three times greater than was being projected at the time.

The caveat to the study may appear somewhat prescient, now that the line is on the verge of opening: “Actual demand for Crossrail and for Central London stations is likely to be different from the projections shown, because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected.”

As recently as last year, anyone engaged in revising rail passenger forecasts – perhaps building a tentative model of how the UK would emerge from the pandemic – could not have factored in the events and circumstances which have arisen in the first few months of 2022.

The principles of transport planning have long embraced both the ideas of catering for demand and stimulating it. Cautious public sector finance has never been an easy source for radical new transport concepts where firm figures are wanted to justify ‘grand designs’. Crossrail could have only gone ahead in a climate of growing demand and pressure on the existing system. But now it has been built, it’s there to be used by anyone for any purpose. “Build it and they will come” could never have been the business case. But it has been built, and so we shall now see if they do come....and where they go.

RhodriClark

Rhodri Clark is a specialist transport writer based in North Wales. He has been contributing to Local Transport Today magazine since the 1990s, primarily on Welsh subjects. He appears on Welsh radio and TV to comment on transport issues.

Peter Stonham is the Editorial Director of TAPAS Network

Peter Stonham.jpeg
del1-20220516
taster
Read more articles by Rhodri Clark
The Welsh Government Roads Review
The much-anticipated report of the Sloman review of road building in Wales, and the Welsh Government’s response to it, have been published. In a further radical step spear-headed by minister Lee Waters there will be a much reduced programme of road building and improvement to a very different set of criteria as recommended by the review panel. Peter Stonham and Rhodri Clark look at this distinctive approach, how it was shaped and the way it will be implemented.
Elizabeth line defies elasticity models: modal transfers and generated demand provide new paradigm for high profile changes to network
TAPAS continues its close monitoring of how the new Elizabeth Line is changing transport patterns in London. With new data now available on usage and the origin of passengers, Rhodri Clark examines some surprising outcomes and their potential implications for those planning similar transformational schemes.
TfL sets new best practice benchmark with approach to Elizabeth Line implementation and evaluation
A London tradition of comprehensive planning and implementation for major urban transport projects has been further refined with the addition of The Elizabeth Line to the network. Transport for London and its predecessors have had enviable resources – financial and professional – for such transformative schemes. Nevertheless, TfL’s approach, particularly that to monitoring and data analysis, can provide many useful lessons for projects by other authorities, as Rhodri Clark discovered when he spoke to the team at TfL.
Read more articles by Peter Stonham
So is this the end of the Growth Plan - and what is transport’s role in the economy anyway?
CHANCELLOR KWASI KWARTENG has gone - after a record short stay at 11 Downing Street. But has his Growth Plan, hatched with his neighbour at number 10, gone with him? Either way, it is worth reflecting on what lay behind it, and even if it made any kind of sense against the stated objectives of boosting the country’s economic growth, particularly in relation to transport. Its core content of more than 100 transport schemes on a fast build hit list – dominated by road building – might have seemed superficially ‘good for transport’, but criticism has been strong in some quarters, as our editorial in the previous issue anticipated. 
Transport – not just carbon hungry
IT IS GENERALLY ACCEPTED that transport-related activity accounts for between 25-30 percent of global CO2 emissions, and the sector is not yet significantly reducing that very material effect on global warming. There is considerable data and research knowledge about the sector’s carbon footprint and contribution to climate change. This is normally related directly to its fossil fuel consumption. Alongside this, transport is also indisputably a very significant consumer of other finite material resources on the planet, yet very few figures are available for this part of its impacts.
Lessons from the Summit: thinking beyond the transport mantra
TRANSPORT PROFESSIONALS, whose role is essentially that of advisers and experts rather than decision makers, have to a significant extent become unrealistic, and perhaps complacent, in the degree to which they expect those with the authority to implement the ideas which the professionals believe are appropriate.
Read more articles on TAPAS
This might turn out to be another significant moment
REFLECTING on the 5th Annual Local Transport Summit in Brentford last month, I felt privileged to be part of a discussion that could come to be seen as a significant moment in the history of professional transport planning in the UK. The significance may not have been the event itself, or any of the individual speakers and their presentations. But after the traumatic experience of the past 18 months it provided a special opportunity to get together physically and to take stock of what had changed in the world since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Politics in the driving seat
TO SOME PEOPLE, politics should be about expressions of leadership and commitment that construct an appeal amongst the electorate to get behind a vision. For others, it is “the art of the possible”, and to get elected, politicians must first listen closely to the concerns and priorities of the voters, and bring them promises of action that resonate. The next 12-18 months will test the primacy of one or other of these two approaches in the run up to the next General Election.
Not quite what we planned for - but still an asset
IF THE PAST is not always a good guide to what will be happening in the future, the present is not an awful lot better. We live in unstable times, and the current state of the world is not one of comfortable equilibrium, or certainty on which to build our plans. Not that it ever really was so in modern times, apart from a few relatively brief and tranquil epochs. One thing that looking backwards can reveal, of course, is how we were once anticipating things might pan out – and the closeness of that to actuality.