TAPAS.network | 11 February 2022 | Commentary | John Siraut

Road User Charging – does the switch to electric mean its time has now come?

David Metz

Last year John Siraut was amongst transport professionals to give evidence to the Transport Select Committee’s Inquiry into Road Pricing. The Committee’s report, just published, comes out strongly in favour of the need to consider a range of options to replace fuel and vehicle excise duties, including charging motorists according to distance driven, vehicle type and the level of congestion. Here John Siraut explores the underlying public policy issues posed by the increasing switch to electric vehicles.

THE TRANSPORT SELECT COMMITTEE’S INQUIRY into Road Pricing raises the prospect of a range of options to replace fuel and vehicle excise duties, including a sophisticated technology-enabled form of road pricing that would charge motorists according to distance driven, their vehicle type and the level of congestion at the time and place.

But it also raises some very challenging public policy issues surrounding the continuing switch to electric vehicles – and the Government’s encouragement of it.

It is notable that the Committee highlight the need for the Government to make it clear to owners of electric vehicles, that in the future, they will be required to pay for road usage to the same extent as owners of internal combustion engine vehicles do now.

The move to electric vehicles is seen by some to be a panacea to a whole range of transport problems but it leads to three major issues. The first, that the Committee emphasise in their report, is a loss of tax revenue.

The impact of both the freeze in fuel duty rates and the growth in electric vehicles is illustrated in figure 1 (below), which shows revenue for fuel duty in real terms declining by around a sixth since the turn of the century.

ltt839js1

To replace that level of revenue the basic rate of income tax would need to increase by around 5p in the pound, ie the basic rate would need to increase from 20% to 25%, something that it could be politically difficult to do. Road pricing replaces an existing motoring tax that is rapidly diminishing in terms of revenue it brings in and ensures motorists continue to pay a fair contribution towards the upkeep of the road network.

green quotations

“study for the Department for Transport reported a range which would imply that a 50% reduction in fuel prices, resulting from a switch from petrol/diesel to electric cars could lead to an increase in miles driven of 5-25%, exacerbating congestion and air quality problems.

The second issue these changes raise is the level of vehicle use and thus congestion. With no fuel duty, the cost of operating an electric vehicle is considerably lower than a conventionally powered one. According to EDF the comparative fuel costs of running an electric car are around 4p per mile compared to 9p per mile for a petrol car. There is considerable divergence in the evidence on scale of fuel price elasticities. (That is, the degree that a change in the price of fuel leads to a change in demand.) A study for the Department for Transport reported a range which would imply that a 50% reduction in fuel prices, resulting from a switch from petrol/diesel to electric cars could lead to an increase in miles driven of 5-25%, exacerbating congestion and air quality problems. The latter relates to increased tyre and brake dust.

Only a few years ago commentators were talking about peak car. However, as figure 2 (below) shows, after virtually no growth in car use in the first decade of this millennium, usage has steadily ticked up so that pre-pandemic it was 20% higher than in 2000, while growth in the use of “white vans” has been enormous, up by over 70%.

ltt839js2

Electric vehicles may therefore exacerbate the economic and environmental costs of congestion.
The third implication of the move to electric vehicles is on the question of energy supply and sustainability. On the face of it, going electric addresses the climate change issue. However, as all sectors of the economy are moving towards decarbonisation there is a significant increase in demand for electricity, which is the third problem.

In 2019, cars and taxis drove 278.2bn and light goods vehicles 55.5bn miles. In normal driving conditions it is estimated 1kwH of electricity provides enough charge to drive 3.5 miles for cars and 2.2 miles for LGVs. As shown in figure 3 (below), this requires 104,700 GwH of generating power per year, this is the equivalent to the output of an additional four Hinkley Point C nuclear power stations or six Dogger Bank Wind Farms.

ltt839js3

Hence, without a move to road pricing there is a risk that congestion will increase, general taxation will need to rise, and the drive to decarbonise the whole economy will be delayed.

The Select Committee has usefully tackled these important and critical matters in its very timely report. They are set to be at the centre of transport policy for years to come.

John Siraut is director of economics at Jacobs.

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT839, 11 February 2022.

d1-20220211-1-1
taster
Read more articles by John Siraut
How sandwich sales have added new insights about current transport and travel trends
Taking the pulse of transport activity in the shorter term is a different challenge to plotting long term modal usage trends - and can potentially benefit from less obvious data sources. John Siraut looks at some new indicators that could be valuable markers in this regard - some that might be unexpected, but revealing alternative measures of transport use.
Pandemic responses to travel-to-work seem here to stay - and have highlighted levels of car dependency
Changing journey to work patterns, and particularly the growth of working-from-home are an important issue for transport planners. New ONS survey results seem to confirm post-pandemic patterns are here to stay. John Siraut examines the new data, and continues his look at the 2021 England and Wales Census data related to patterns of car ownership and travel to work at the most fine-grained local level. He finds an underlying high level of car-dependency in most areas.
UK Goods movement and freight traffic flows – a key transport activity deserving greater understanding
The significance of freight movement on Britain’s road system is generally given rather less attention than it should, says John Siraut. The patterns of lorries and vans on both long-hauls and local deliveries are hard to monitor in detail - let alone the nature of the goods on board. He takes a look at the latest available official data.
Read more articles on TAPAS
Net Zero requires reappraisal of the road programme: but how?
In February the Court of Appeal ruled against Heathrow’s third runway proposal because it had not taken account the Government’s legal commitments to reduce carbon emissions. The Government decided not to appeal. Now the DfT has published its important new Decarbonising trans- port: setting the challenge report, which, as transport secretary Grant Shapps wrote in the foreword, implies significantly reducing car use and rein- stating public transport, walking and cycling, as the preferred modes of choice.
It’s a Wonder - Up-tight, everything’s alright on side street junctions
Why does provision for motorised traffic still seem to get far too much priority at the junctions between main roads and side streets, to the considerable detriment for pedestrians, wonders John Dales. He looks at the obvious benefits from toning down the over-designed highway engineering traditionally used, in favour of making life easier for those on foot or wheeling along the pavements when they reach these intimidating crossing points.
The deep flaws in how we model freight
The treatment of freight movements is an area of serious weakness in transport planning, writes Professor Phil Goodwin. The assumptions being made are not underpinned by adequate understanding, suffer from a lack of suitable data analysis, and embed misrepresentation of commercial and economic realities. All this seems highly likely to be leading to inappropriate decision-making. An in-depth review is needed, he argues.