TAPAS.network | 8 August 2022 | Commentary | John Siraut

Working from home - a changing pattern

John Siraut

The Pandemic has brought about some significant changes to the ways people work, commuting flows and demand for transport capacity. But the situation varies by region, type of work, status level and gender says John Siraut, as he looks into some of the detailed data.

COMMUTING HAS TRADITIONALLY BEEN a significant proportion of trips made, and the miles people travel, as shown in table 1. Unlike most other trips, these are heavily concentrated at certain times of the day leading to congestion on the road network and overcrowding on public transport. However, these numbers are for 2019 and a lot has changed since then as we all know. 

ltt851c.2.1

A significant number of people already worked from home for at least part of their working week long before the pandemic, and that number had been steadily rising over time. However, the pandemic accelerated that trend dramatically. It raised the numbers of both people working permanently at home and those who spend part of their working time at home and part in a particular place of employment. These ‘flexible workers’ now make up 70% of those to be found working at home.

Figure 1 (below) shows the percentage of people who worked from home pre-pandemic and who does so now. Back in 2019 some 15% of the workforce worked from home, ranging from 10% in Scotland and the North East, to 20% in the South East. Now 30% of the workforce work from home, dominated by London and the South East where 37% do. London saw the biggest increase in home working - up 23 percentage points - with Northern Ireland seeing very little increase, and at 16% having the fewest proportion of home workers. 

ltt845.c.1

It may be that age and occupation are greater determinants of home working than gender.

ltt851c.2.2

The ability to work from home depends of course on the nature of the job undertaken, and not surprisingly varies considerably. However, there are still large regional differences for those undertaking similar roles as shown in figure 2. While nearly 50% of managers in the South East work from home this falls to 23% in Northern Ireland. There is less regional variation amongst administrative staff apart from Northern Ireland again. Perhaps surprisingly London has one of the lower rates of home working amongst this latter group of administration workers.

ltt845.c.2


When it comes to age, there is again a fairly clear pattern in most regions, the message being that the older you are the more likely you are to work from home, (figure 3.) While nearly 45% of 60+ year olds are working from home in Wales, that falls to less than 20% for those aged under 30. London sees the least variation based on age and has by far the highest proportion of under 30s home working. This would suggest it’s not just the occupation and seniority that drives the level of home working, but other factors such as the cost of and time taken up by commuting.

ltt845.c.3

What about gender? In most regions men are more likely to work from home than women, although as shown in figure 4 the differences are not that great between the two. It may be that age and occupation are greater determinants of home working than gender. In the South West and North East the difference is three percentage points in relation to men compared to women working from home, while in the South East the difference is just 1 percentage point in favour of women.

ltt851c.2.5quotations 5

26% of women working part time travel from home to work via another destination, most commonly a school. For men working full time this figure is just 9%.

Why Travel? Understanding our need to move and how it shapes our lives was published last year (2021) by Bristol University Press.

John Siraut is director of economics at Jacobs.

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT851, 8 August 2022.

d5-20220808
taster
Read more articles by John Siraut
What is the impact of the £2 fare cap - and could it change the trajectory of bus use?
The introduction earlier this year of a £2 maximum bus fare in England, and its subsequent extension, has the potential to alter the appeal of bus travel to a small but significant audience, believes John Siraut. He examines who stands to benefit most, what the initial indications of the user response are.
National Travel Survey shows still unfinished patterns of change
Each year the Department for Transport publishes its National Travel Survey for England, providing a snapshot of our travelling behaviour; why we travel; for how long; and by what means. There is usually not much change from year to year, but the pandemic has changed our travel behaviour and in this article John Siraut looks at some of those changes between 2018/2019 and 2021.
Rail use is growing – but is split ticketing inflating the estimated passenger numbers?
Rail passengers numbers seem to have been bouncing back further since the big falls due to the pandemic. But are the figures being announced by the Office of Rail and Road telling the true story, based as they are on ticket sales rather than monitored actual journeys. John Siraut looks at the impact of the ‘split ticketing’ issue by which users save money by buying more than one ticket for a single journey
Read more articles on TAPAS
Digital Navigation is driving traffic in new directions – we need to respond
Road users are changing their behaviour based on what their satnavs tell them, but the implications are not yet being recognised by those responsible for planning and operating the network, says David Metz. He urges more attention to both the negative and positive consequences, with greater collaboration between the interested parties to the benefit of users and society alike.
Time to redefine ‘road safety’?
THE ANIVERSARY of the introduction of compulsory seatbelt wearing 40 years ago usefully prompts some reflections on the changing perceptions and priorities relating to what has traditionally been known as ‘road safety’. As does the fact that a significantly amended version of the Highway Code, introducing the concept of a road user hierarchy of responsibility for the first time, was issued a year ago, as explored in a contribution to this issue from Tom Cohen.
Blue sky, or mission-led? Setting the right research agenda
When budgets are squeezed, and priorities are set, some things are always going to be seen as more desirable - or expendable - than others. And that depends on your point of view. This can apply at both aggregate overall levels, and in more detailed areas of expenditure like research and development. Especially so if it is funding about conceptual and behavioural matters with ‘soft’ or uncertain outcomes, that is being considered.