TAPAS.network | 11 March 2022 | Commentary | John Siraut

Pandemic-hit varying rail use patterns revealed

John Siraut

Covid 19 restrictions brought serious reductions in rail travel around the country, but the impacts were varied. John Siraut takes a look at the detailed figures for 2020/21 and finds both some expected and unexpected outcomes reflecting both commuter and leisure travel impacts. How will the sector recover, he wonders.

AS COVID RESTRICTIONS are lifted the question arises as to how regional rail use was impacted during the pandemic. The latest statistics from the Office of Rail and Road, which covers the financial year 2020-21, highlights the differing importance of rail to the various regions and sub-regions of Great Britain and the impact of Covid restrictions at the devolved level. During this period there were both stringent lockdowns and a period over the summer when things almost returned to normal except for international travel. This led to an increase in the number of domestic holidays to a level last seen in the pre-charter flight era. Each figure shows the percentage of rail journeys made in 2020-21 compared to the situation in 2019-20. Overall passenger numbers were 74% down on the year before. However, as the analysis shows the impact varied by journey type and location.

Figure 1 shows the best and worst performing inter-regional journey pairs in terms of retaining passengers during the pandemic. It appears that shorter trips between adjacent regions performed the best and longer distance journeys the worst. Trips to and from Yorkshire and the Humber and Scotland were amongst the worst impacted, the latter nation having generally tighter Covid restrictions than England. Although those between the North East and the West Midlands fell by over 90%. Stay-vacations and day trips to the coast may be the reason for stronger demand between the South East and the South West, the West Midlands and Wales and the East Midlands to the East of England. But even the best performing inter-regional services were down on the national average with no inter-regional pairs achieving more than 25% of the journeys compared to pre-Covid.

841.31.1 ltt845.c.1

It appears that shorter trips between adjacent regions performed the best and longer distance journeys the worst. Trips to and from Yorkshire and the Humber and Scotland were amongst the worst impacted, the latter nation having generally tighter Covid restrictions than England.

Figure 2 shows the number of rail journeys wholly within each region in 2020-21 as a percentage of those in 2019-20. Given the generally tighter Covid restrictions in operation in Scotland and Wales it is not surprising that these regions saw rail trips fall the most, down by over 80%. Trips within the East of England held up best, running at 36% of pre-Covid levels. Generally shorter intra-regional trips held up better than longer distance inter-regional ones.

ltt845.c.2

At a more local level, figure 3, shows intra-regional trips starting and ending by sub-region. Given their more stringent lock downs and limited commuting it is the more rural areas of Scotland and Wales that experienced the largest falls in patronage, down by around 85%. More surprisingly given one would expect higher levels of local commuting trips, the West Midlands and Greater Manchester also saw some of the largest falls in passenger journeys, whereas trips on Merseyside held up markedly better. London was a very mixed picture, the very heavily office, leisure and retail base of Inner London West saw a 76% reduction in passenger journeys while outer East and North East London with a higher proportion of people who could not work from home saw a 67% fall. Undoubtedly buoyed by stay-vacations Cornwall and Devon saw some of the best performances with passenger trips at nearly 40% of pre-Covid levels.

ltt845.c.3

It is clear that shorter local journeys held up best during the pandemic, while areas in holiday locations generally doing better than major city regions. Rail patronage is now running at around 60% of pre-Covid levels and is continuing to recover. It will be interesting to see which areas of the country bounce back quicker especially as tensions in Europe, continued concerns about the pandemic and increasing awareness of the need to reduce emissions, encourages more people to holiday in the UK, driving growth in both short and longer distance leisure trips.

John Siraut is director of economics at Jacobs.

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT841, 11 March 2022.

d5-20220311
taster
Read more articles by John Siraut
Counting the changing cost of travel- not quite what it sometimes seems
How significant is the cost of transport to household budgets – and has it being going up? What are the relative movements in car, bus and rail travel expenditures - and why? Is government policy a major influence? John Siraut unpicks the data and finds some important fundamental factors, emerging trends and regional variations
NTS 2022 records continuing impacts of the Pandemic – but dominance of car still shows through
Travel patterns were dramatically changed by the COVID 19 Pandemic, and the restrictions it brought. The new National Travel Survey results for 2020 show a further revival against the very low trip levels of 2020 and 2021, but still below 2019. John Siraut examines the data, and considers whether it indicates a permanent new position, in which travel activity is lower, and car users and non users have very contrasting types of trip making.
Rail use is growing – but is split ticketing inflating the estimated passenger numbers?
Rail passengers numbers seem to have been bouncing back further since the big falls due to the pandemic. But are the figures being announced by the Office of Rail and Road telling the true story, based as they are on ticket sales rather than monitored actual journeys. John Siraut looks at the impact of the ‘split ticketing’ issue by which users save money by buying more than one ticket for a single journey
Read more articles on TAPAS
‘Get out of my way’ thinking is an unfair route to road safety
Despite attempts to achieve a better balance between the interests of pedestrians and cyclists, and motorised vehicles on the local road networks they both share, why are the most fragile road users invariably expected to get out of the way of the most robust ones, asks Tom Cohen. He looks at the realities of the hierarchy of responsibility set out in the recently revised Highway Code, and fears embedded thinking about traffic and highway engineering in the pursuit of road safety may only become more vehicle-dominated with the coming of automated vehicles
The National Infrastructure Commission’s Transport Assessment: How much does it help us move forward?
What is the contribution of the National Infrastructure Commission to better long-term planning of the transport network, asks David Metz. He finds some logical weaknesses in its latest National Infrastructure Assessment in respect of investment in roads, is disappointed with its apparent limited capability for original and challenging thinking, and is concerned that the Commission’s status and purpose is subordinate to the Government’s more immediate political priorities. Has it a useful future, he wonders.
Why we need to look at Travel Behaviour differently now
The new government is promising to take a different course on transport, but it is not just policy change on railways and buses, and even roads, that’s needed, believes David Metz. A core component of thinking must be to reassess what kind of travel behaviour we are seeking to cater for now, and where that fits in wider national objectives, especially decarbonisation. In view of the importance of the subject, he’s written a new book about it, which he reflects upon here.