TAPAS.network | 3 April 2023 | Commentary | John Siraut

Elizabeth Line lifts rail passenger numbers back over pre-Pandemic levels – and makes TfL one of Britain’s biggest rail operators

John Siraut

The success of the Elizabeth Line has taken total UK rail use beyond the passenger numbers experienced before the Pandemic struck. It also highlights the dominance of London and the South East for rail travel, and the major role now being played as a train operator by Transport for London – both with the Elizabeth Line and London Overground. John Siraut looks at this phenomenon, and also explores where the new passengers are coming from

ON A FEW DAYS in late February and early March this year, daily passenger usage of the national rail network exceeded pre-pandemic levels for the first time. While this was cause for celebration across the rail sector, a key reason for this increase in usage was not a national pattern of growth, but a local one due to opening of London’s new Elizabeth Line.

It is sometimes difficult to comprehend the scale of a new rail link, but the map below (Figure 1) created by Director of Automatic Knowledge, Alasdair Rae, helps bring it to life – showing that if built in the North of England, the link originally known as Cross Rail, would stretch from Sheffield to Liverpool. Admittedly, only the central section is completely newly built, but even that is 42km long, which would get you most of the way from Manchester to Liverpool.

With the actual Elizabeth Line endpoints incorporating erstwhile suburban services extending to Reading in the West, and Abbey Wood and Shenfield in the East, the new line carried more than 100 million passengers in its first eight months since opening last May, many of them transfers from London Underground, but a significant number new to the rail network.

866.34.1866.34.2

The latest rail usage data from the Office for Rail and Road covers the period October-December 2022. This shows, as can be seen in Figure 2, that the Elizabeth Line is now the second busiest route in the national network in terms of passengers carried, with over 62 million passengers for the period. London Overground was the third largest, with nearly 40 million passengers – which means Transport for London (TfL) is now responsible for carrying over a quarter of all national rail passengers. The five largest London-focused train operating companies (TOCs), including the dominant cross-London ThamesLink network, meanwhile account for over 60% of all passengers.

866.34.3

A slightly different picture emerges when comparing passenger kilometres, that is, distance travelled (Figure 3). Thameslink is still the largest TOC, but it is then followed by the long distance operators. While TfL then accounts for just 6% of passenger kilometres.

866.34.4

In terms of the rate of recovery of rail passengers since the Pandemic, this varies considerably by TOC. Levels on the East Coast Main Line are now all above pre-pandemic levels, despite – or perhaps because of – another new entrant competing on the route. Both Hull Trains and Grand Central, and London North Eastern have passed their pre-Covid levels. At the other end of the scale are mainly the London commuter TOCs, significantly impacted by the decline in the previous levels of ‘five weekdays’ commuting, and Avanti West Coast and TransPennine, both of which were dogged by high levels of cancellations and reliability issues over the fourth quarter 2022 period.

866.34.5

The changing nature of the rail market and the impact of the Elizabeth Line can be further seen in Figure 5. This shows how passenger numbers have changed by type of operator for each fourth quarter since 2015. Between 2015 and 2019, it was the regional TOCs that saw the highest growth followed by the long-distance operators – London and the South East – and finally the open access operators. Coming out of the pandemic, the situation has reversed with the open access operators performing best and regional operators the slowest to recover. However, the opening of the Elizabeth Line saw passenger numbers in the London and South East increase significantly between Quarter 4 2021 and the same period in 2022.

866.34.6

The changing use of the network has meanwhile impacted the type of ticket passengers are using. Use of Advance tickets was growing rapidly pre-pandemic, and has now more than recovered beyond that position, with usage now at record levels. Full fare and off-peak fare ticket sales have also returned to pre-pandemic levels, and are 20% higher than they were back in 2015. Use of season tickets was gradually declining even before the pandemic. In 2019 Q4 they were a further 15% down on the level in 2015 Q4. They are now at a third of pre-pandemic levels, reflecting the massive change in working habits and increased home/office hybrid working, which means planning travel purchasing against five day a week usage is no longer attractive, and thus season ticket buying much reduced.

866.34.7

If regular commuting has changed – particularly into London – the high usage levels of the Elizabeth Line demonstrate that ‘urban rail’ still has a major role to play.

The original modelling for the Elizabeth Line predicted virtually all of its users in central London would transfer from other modes of public transport. It was after all designed to relieve heavily congested parts of London’s public transport network. The reality has been slightly different as can be seen in Figure 7. This shows where demand was forecast to come from and where it did actually materialise. Transfers from London Underground are broadly in line with expectations, but those from National Rail and the Docklands Light Railway are significantly less. Transfers from buses have been cancelled out by more passengers using them to access Elizabeth Line stations especially at Woolwich and Abbey Wood. Instead there has been a significant generation of new trips as the new service makes accessing central London significantly easier from east and west.

866.34.8

The long-delayed opening of the Elizabeth Line has given a big boost to rail use at a time of considerable disruption due to industrial relations and reliability issues elsewhere. It has also made TfL one of the biggest national rail operators, albeit with some switching from the Underground, though if you add that rail system in, TfL is genuinely now Britain’s dominant train service provider and passenger carrier.

References and Links

John Siraut is director of economics at Jacobs.

This article was first published in LTT magazine, LTT866, 3 April 2023.

d5-20230403
taster
Read more articles by John Siraut
NTS 2022 records continuing impacts of the Pandemic – but dominance of car still shows through
Travel patterns were dramatically changed by the COVID 19 Pandemic, and the restrictions it brought. The new National Travel Survey results for 2020 show a further revival against the very low trip levels of 2020 and 2021, but still below 2019. John Siraut examines the data, and considers whether it indicates a permanent new position, in which travel activity is lower, and car users and non users have very contrasting types of trip making.
Latest London travel data drills down into changing daily patterns of bus and rail use
Post-pandemic travel behaviour changes have brought a number of challenges for transport authorities and operators, with both revenue implications and service planning issues to address. Tracking data has been emerging only patchily, so John Siraut has been pleased to examine the comprehensive information now available from Transport for London on key trends.
How does the public view the deployment of new technology in transport?
Emerging new technologies could significantly reshape the transport landscape in coming years – but are the travelling public ready to embrace their adoption? The Department for Transport conducts a regular technology tracker attitudes survey and John Siraut takes a look at its findings and what they tell us.
Read more articles on TAPAS
Is changing fares the route to more public transport use and modal shift?
Would more people choose bus and rail travel if lower fares were charged? And is it the absolute level of fares which is significant, or their relative levels compared with the cost of car use? Perhaps the nature of the tariff structure, the method of payment for individual journeys or the opportunities for daily or period single-area or system-wide ‘freedom passes’ or discount deals is a significant factor in making bus and rail use more attractive? This multi-authored TAPAS article looks at the available evidence, and some recent new pricing initiatives
It’s not all about Economic Growth now, stupid.
ANYONE SEEKING to discover what the new Truss Government’s transport policy might be should find the Chancellor’s ‘Growth Plan 2022’ an instructive read. This document, tabled by Kwasi Kwarteng as he delivered his mini budget just over a week ago, unashamedly (at least for now) makes economic growth the Government’s central mission, setting a target of reaching a 2.5% trend rate. It claims that “Sustainable growth” will lead to higher wages, greater opportunities and “provide sustainable funding for public services,” although the reaction of the financial markets clearly questioned the affordability and budgetary prudence of the measures Kwarteng announced in a bid to achieve his aims. 
Latest London travel data drills down into changing daily patterns of bus and rail use
Post-pandemic travel behaviour changes have brought a number of challenges for transport authorities and operators, with both revenue implications and service planning issues to address. Tracking data has been emerging only patchily, so John Siraut has been pleased to examine the comprehensive information now available from Transport for London on key trends.